03 Août When you look at the cyber dating abuse, there clearly was up to ten
step three. Abilities
Table step 1 portrays the new prevalence of every of risks of the research, with regards to the amount of severity discovered. In addition, it suggests this new comparisons between the withdrawals away from girls and boys into the more risks. Complete, the participants exactly who presented nothing wrong ranged ranging from % that has no problems having difficult Sites use and up so you're able to 83.4% who had no problems having hot or not chat on the internet brushing. We keep in mind that all of the moderate and you will severe dilemmas varied between cuatro% having sexting and you may 17% getting difficult Web sites have fun with. 9% out of modest/severe issues plus cyberbullying, it hit thirteen.7%. The fresh frequencies based in the more levels of issues were usually better for girls compared to boys.
Table 1
Frequency of every of one's threats while the a purpose of the brand new seriousness of your state on full take to and of intercourse.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch's t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15).