When you look at the cyber dating abuse, there clearly was up to ten

03 Août When you look at the cyber dating abuse, there clearly was up to ten

step three. Abilities

Table step 1 portrays the new prevalence of every of risks of the research, with regards to the amount of severity discovered. In addition, it suggests this new comparisons between the withdrawals away from girls and boys into the more risks. Complete, the participants exactly who presented nothing wrong ranged ranging from % that has no problems having difficult Sites use and up so you’re able to 83.4% who had no problems having hot or not chat on the internet brushing. We keep in mind that all of the moderate and you will severe dilemmas varied between cuatro% having sexting and you may 17% getting difficult Web sites have fun with. 9% out of modest/severe issues plus cyberbullying, it hit thirteen.7%. The fresh frequencies based in the more levels of issues were usually better for girls compared to boys.

Table 1

Frequency of every of one’s threats while the a purpose of the brand new seriousness of your state on full take to and of intercourse.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Desk dos ).

Table 2

Distinctions because a purpose of instructional phase (1st–2nd, 3rd–fourth levels from CSE and you can Post-additional Degree) throughout the risks (n = 3212, except for the fact from cyber matchmaking abuse having letter = 1061).

Note: M = arithmetic suggest; SD = practical departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? dos = eta squared.

Desk step 3 reveals new correlations between your certain dangers. All of them had self-confident and you can tall correlations together, to your dating between cyberbullying victimization and cyber dating victimization condition out. Websites risks with an intimate role (on the internet brushing and sexting) have been extremely synchronised. Generally, the brand new correlations had been high getting males in the most common of your own threats, apart from the new matchmaking between cyber relationship victimization and you may brushing and you can ranging from difficult Web sites have fun with and you will cyberbullying victimization, on line brushing and you can sexting.

Dining table step 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Table 4 merchandise brand new comorbidities one of the individuals Web sites risks associated so you can personal communication (cyberbullying victimization, cyber dating abuse victimization, sexting and online grooming). Precisely the players just who done all the items towards dangers relevant to victimization (letter = 1109) was in fact experienced (we.elizabeth., eliminating about investigation people who had no lover). Of one’s kept players, sixty.7% showed one or more of one’s analysed risks (n = 674). The risk into the high private prevalence is cyberbullying victimization (%), with on the internet brushing. The most prevalent two-exposure combinations was basically cyberbullying victimization-online grooming and you will cyberbullying-sexting. We high light the 3-risk blend of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. Ultimately, 5.49% of the victimized teens presented all the dangers conjointly.